Crypto Controversy: Bybit Demands Close to $100K Refund from ParaSwap DAO in Connection to Hacker Fees

Crypto Exchange Challenges Decentralized Governance, Questions Ethics Over Hacker's ill-gotten Gains

Crypto Controversy: Bybit Demands Close to $100K Refund from ParaSwap DAO in Connection to Hacker Fees

Key Points

  • Bybit is asking ParaSwap DAO to refund over $90,000 in Ethereum (ETH) swap fees related to a $1.46 billion theft.
  • The request has sparked a governance debate in the decentralized finance community over setting a legal precedent.
  • Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit is seeking a refund from ParaSwap DAO. The refund is for swap fees linked to a significant theft. This request has provoked discussion within the decentralized finance community. The debate centers around the potential for setting a legal precedent.

    Details of the Request

    Prominent defi analyst Ignas shared the news in a post on March 4. Ignas is also a Paraswap DAO delegate. He stated that Bybit requested the return of 44.67 ETH from the ParaSwap DAO. These funds were paid in swap fees by the individual who hacked Bybit.

    Ignas highlighted the ethical and legal implications of this decision. He noted that it could set a precedent for the wider DeFi ecosystem, including Thorswap. Bybit is a significant player in the space. Returning the funds could potentially avoid legal complications. However, this action could also establish a precedent.

    Ignas emphasized that the DAO earned the fees legitimately through smart contracts. He questioned the implications of returning funds now for future cases. He also pointed out that Bybit’s security issues contributed to the hack.

    Ignas proposed a compromise. He suggested returning most of the funds, with a deduction of 10% for Bybit’s official bounty.

    Bybit’s CEO Ben Zhou previously disclosed that nearly 20% of the stolen funds are now untraceable. This comes less than two weeks after the exchange lost over $1.4 billion in a sophisticated attack. The attack was allegedly carried out by hackers supported by North Korea.

    Exit mobile version